DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2003 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMercury
EconolineModelMountaineer
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
193 HPPower235 HP
331 NmTorque395 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank79 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4790 mm
2014 mmWidth1875 mm
2050 mmHeight1830 mm
2370 KgWeight—
3505 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2003 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…