DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Discovery vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
DiscoveryModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
7Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
185 HPPower193 HP
340 NmTorque331 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank132 lt
23,3 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
12,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength5382 mm
1860 mmWidth2014 mm
1890 mmHeight2050 mm
2020 KgWeight2370 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Discovery and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…