DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
Land CruiserModelEconoline
2002Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
8Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4164 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
204 HPPower193 HP
430 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
96 ltFuel tank132 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
275/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4940 mmLength5382 mm
1940 mmWidth2014 mm
1880 mmHeight2050 mm
2650 KgWeight2370 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…