DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford F-150 vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford F-150

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
F-150ModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
—Body typeMinivan
—Seats8
—Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
202 HPPower193 HP
206 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length5382 mm
—Width2014 mm
—Height2050 mm
—Weight2370 Kg
—Wheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford F-150 and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford F-150 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…