DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Buick Regal vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
RegalModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
203 HPPower193 HP
305 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank132 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 HydramaticGears4
215/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4983 mmLength5382 mm
1847 mmWidth2014 mm
1438 mmHeight2050 mm
1600 KgWeight2370 Kg
2769 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Buick Regal and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…