DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Explorer vs 2003 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelEconoline
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
213 HPPower193 HP
339 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank132 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength5382 mm
1830 mmWidth2014 mm
1830 mmHeight2050 mm
1965 KgWeight2370 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Explorer and 2003 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…