2003 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.2 i V6 (193 Hp) 2003Overall Score67.75/100
2003 Ford Econoline vs 2003 Ford F-150 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
F-150
Ford F-150 2003Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford F-150
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EconolineSpecificationFord F-150
FordMakeFord
EconolineModelF-150
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody type—
8Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Ford EconolineSpecificationFord F-150
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
193 HPPower202 HP
331 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EconolineSpecificationFord F-150
PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank0 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford EconolineSpecificationFord F-150
5382 mmLength—
2014 mmWidth—
2050 mmHeight—
2370 KgWeight—
3505 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Econoline and 2003 Ford F-150 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford F-150 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSLand Rover Discovery vs Ford Econoline2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord F-150 vs Ford Econoline2003 and 2003 model years
VSFord Explorer vs Ford Econoline2003 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Land Cruiser vs Ford Econoline2002 and 2003 model years
VSBuick Regal vs Ford Econoline2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…