DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Econoline vs 2004 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
EconolineModelExplorer
2003Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
4192 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
193 HPPower242 HP
331 NmTorque382 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
132 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5382 mmLength4813 mm
2014 mmWidth1832 mm
2050 mmHeight1814 mm
2370 KgWeight1990 Kg
3505 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Econoline and 2004 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…