2012 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
2012 Volvo XC90 vs 2011 Toyota Blade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationToyota Blade
VolvoMakeToyota
XC90ModelBlade
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationToyota Blade
9,5 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3192 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
243 HPPower280 HP
320 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationToyota Blade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationToyota Blade
4807 mmLength4220 mm
1936 mmWidth1760 mm
1743 mmHeight1515 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo XC90 and 2011 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Captiva vs Volvo XC902012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Navara vs Volvo XC902012 and 2012 model yearsVSImage unavailableToyota Blade vs Volvo XC902011 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableLand Rover Discovery vs Volvo XC902012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableJeep Commander vs Volvo XC902010 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…