DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Navara vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
NavaraModelXC90
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2991 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
231 HPPower243 HP
550 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
255/65 R17; 255/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4807 mm
1848 mmWidth1936 mm
1795 mmHeight1743 mm
2110 KgWeight—
3200 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Navara and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…