DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CaptivaModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
258 HPPower243 HP
288 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4807 mm
1849 mmWidth1936 mm
1756 mmHeight1743 mm
1815-1920 KgWeight—
2707 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Captiva and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…