DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeVolvo
CommanderModelXC90
2010Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
191 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
218 HPPower243 HP
510 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/65R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4807 mm
1900 mmWidth1936 mm
1826 mmHeight1743 mm
2245 KgWeight—
2781 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…