2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
2011 Toyota Blade vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC90
ToyotaMakeVolvo
BladeModelXC90
2011Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC90
6,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
280 HPPower243 HP
206 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota BladeSpecificationVolvo XC90
4220 mmLength4807 mm
1760 mmWidth1936 mm
1515 mmHeight1743 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Toyota Blade and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…