DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Cedric vs 2012 Dacia Dokker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Dokker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeDacia
CedricModelDokker
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
157 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
85 HPPower85 HP
170 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4363 mm
1695 mmWidth1751 mm
1445 mmHeight1814 mm
1480 KgWeight1090 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Cedric and 2012 Dacia Dokker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Dokker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…