2012 • Dacia
Dokker
Dacia Dokker 1.6 MPI (85Hp) 2012Overall Score50.25/100
2012 Dacia Dokker vs 2012 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0 (85 Hp) 2012Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Dacia Dokker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dacia DokkerSpecificationNissan Cedric
DaciaMakeNissan
DokkerModelCedric
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Dacia DokkerSpecificationNissan Cedric
14,3 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
159 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
85 HPPower85 HP
134 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Dacia DokkerSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dacia DokkerSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Dacia DokkerSpecificationNissan Cedric
4363 mmLength4690 mm
1751 mmWidth1695 mm
1814 mmHeight1445 mm
1090 KgWeight1480 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Dacia Dokker and 2012 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Dacia Dokker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…