DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lexus CT vs 2012 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus CT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeNissan
CTModelCedric
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
180 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower85 HP
142 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol / LPG
45 ltFuel tank0 lt
3,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4690 mm
1765 mmWidth1695 mm
1440 mmHeight1445 mm
1410-1465 KgWeight1480 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lexus CT and 2012 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus CT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…