2012 • Toyota
Auris
Toyota Auris 1.8 VVT-i (136 Hp) 2012Overall Score50.25/100
2012 Toyota Auris vs 2012 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0 (85 Hp) 2012Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Auris
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota AurisSpecificationNissan Cedric
ToyotaMakeNissan
AurisModelCedric
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Toyota AurisSpecificationNissan Cedric
10,9 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
180 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
99 HPPower85 HP
142 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota AurisSpecificationNissan Cedric
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol / LPG
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
3,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Toyota AurisSpecificationNissan Cedric
4275 mmLength4690 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1480 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Toyota Auris and 2012 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Auris leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…