2012 • Opel
Vivaro
Opel Vivaro 2.0 CDTI (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score48.5/100
2012 Opel Vivaro vs 2012 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0 (85 Hp) 2012Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel VivaroSpecificationNissan Cedric
OpelMakeNissan
VivaroModelCedric
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSedan
9Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel VivaroSpecificationNissan Cedric
19,0 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
145 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower85 HP
230 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel VivaroSpecificationNissan Cedric
DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel VivaroSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 TechshiftGears4
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel VivaroSpecificationNissan Cedric
4782 mmLength4690 mm
1904 mmWidth1695 mm
1959 mmHeight1445 mm
1960 KgWeight1480 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Opel Vivaro and 2012 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…