DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSkoda
CarismaModelOctavia
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
200 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
116 HPPower101 HP
162 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
185/65 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4513 mm
1710 mmWidth1731 mm
1405 mmHeight1481 mm
1130 KgWeight1405 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…