2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.9 D (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Volvo S40 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S40ModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower116 HP
265 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4516 mmLength4435 mm
1716 mmWidth1710 mm
1422 mmHeight1405 mm
1295 KgWeight1130 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo S40 and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…