2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.8i 16V (114 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
323ModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
114 HPPower116 HP
161 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4315 mmLength4435 mm
1705 mmWidth1710 mm
1410 mmHeight1405 mm
1125 KgWeight1130 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…