2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
RoverMakeMitsubishi
25ModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15 HTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
3990 mmLength4435 mm
1688 mmWidth1710 mm
1419 mmHeight1405 mm
1135 KgWeight1130 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…