2000 • Rover
45
Rover 45 1.8i 16V (117 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Rover 45 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
RoverMakeMitsubishi
45ModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
9,3 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 45SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4517 mmLength4435 mm
1696 mmWidth1710 mm
1395 mmHeight1405 mm
1230 KgWeight1130 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 45 and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…