2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Rover 45 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
45
Rover 45 1.8i 16V (117 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Rover 45
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 45
MitsubishiMakeRover
CarismaModel45
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 45
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
116 HPPower117 HP
162 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 45
4435 mmLength4517 mm
1710 mmWidth1696 mm
1405 mmHeight1395 mm
1130 KgWeight1230 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…