2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 25
MitsubishiMakeRover
CarismaModel25
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 25
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
116 HPPower117 HP
162 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationRover 25
4435 mmLength3990 mm
1710 mmWidth1688 mm
1405 mmHeight1419 mm
1130 KgWeight1135 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…