DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
CarismaModelScenic
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
200 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
116 HPPower102 HP
162 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R 15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4169 mm
1710 mmWidth1719 mm
1405 mmHeight1675 mm
1130 KgWeight1365 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2564 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…