DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
CarismaModelMegane
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
200 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
116 HPPower102 HP
162 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3967 mm
1710 mmWidth1698 mm
1405 mmHeight1366 mm
1130 KgWeight1105 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…