2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Alfa Romeo
145
Alfa Romeo 145 1.9 JTD (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 145
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
CarismaModel145
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
4Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
116 HPPower105 HP
162 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
4435 mmLength—
1710 mmWidth—
1405 mmHeight—
1130 KgWeight1210 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…