2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Ford Galaxy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFord Galaxy
MitsubishiMakeFord
CarismaModelGalaxy
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFord Galaxy
10,2 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
200 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
116 HPPower110 HP
162 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFord Galaxy
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFord Galaxy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFord Galaxy
4435 mmLength4641 mm
1710 mmWidth1810 mm
1405 mmHeight1730 mm
1130 KgWeight1640 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…