DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Fiat Marea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Marea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
CarismaModelMarea
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
116 HPPower105 HP
162 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4390 mm
1710 mmWidth1740 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
1130 KgWeight1215 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Fiat Marea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Marea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…