2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFiat Bravo
MitsubishiMakeFiat
CarismaModelBravo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFiat Bravo
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
116 HPPower113 HP
162 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi CarismaSpecificationFiat Bravo
4435 mmLength4025 mm
1710 mmWidth1755 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
1130 KgWeight1100 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…