DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
ZTModelScenic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Scenic
11,6 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
195 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Scenic
4740 mmLength4425 mm
1780 mmWidth1775 mm
1410 mmHeight1720 mm
1500 KgWeight1485 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…