DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG ZT
Alfa RomeoMakeMG
156ModelZT
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG ZT
10,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
144 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alfa Romeo 156SpecificationMG ZT
4430 mmLength4740 mm
1745 mmWidth1780 mm
1415 mmHeight1410 mm
1230 KgWeight1500 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…