DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Vivaro vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel VivaroSpecificationMG ZT
OpelMakeMG
VivaroModelZT
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
9Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel VivaroSpecificationMG ZT
16,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
155 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
101 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel VivaroSpecificationMG ZT
DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel VivaroSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel VivaroSpecificationMG ZT
4782 mmLength4740 mm
1904 mmWidth1780 mm
1959 mmHeight1410 mm
1927 KgWeight1500 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Vivaro and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…