DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault ScenicSpecificationMG ZT
RenaultMakeMG
ScenicModelZT
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Renault ScenicSpecificationMG ZT
14,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
170 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
98 HPPower120 HP
250 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault ScenicSpecificationMG ZT
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault ScenicSpecificationMG ZT
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Renault ScenicSpecificationMG ZT
4425 mmLength4740 mm
1775 mmWidth1780 mm
1720 mmHeight1410 mm
1485 KgWeight1500 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…