DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG ZT
RenaultMakeMG
MeganeModelZT
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG ZT
10,1 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
107 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG ZT
4082 mmLength4740 mm
1698 mmWidth1780 mm
1368 mmHeight1410 mm
1125 KgWeight1500 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…