DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Megane
MGMakeRenault
ZTModelMegane
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Megane
11,6 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower107 HP
160 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationRenault Megane
4740 mmLength4082 mm
1780 mmWidth1698 mm
1410 mmHeight1368 mm
1500 KgWeight1125 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…