DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZT vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZTSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
MGMakeAlfa Romeo
ZTModel156
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZTSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
11,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZTSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZTSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZTSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4740 mmLength4430 mm
1780 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1415 mm
1500 KgWeight1230 Kg
2746 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZT and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…