DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
145ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4+1Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
255 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4508 mm
—Width1752 mm
—Height1432 mm
1210 KgWeight1255 Kg
—Wheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…