2000 • Nissan
AD
Nissan AD 1.8 i (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Nissan AD vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Alfa Romeo
145
Alfa Romeo 145 1.9 JTD (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 145
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan ADSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
NissanMakeAlfa Romeo
ADModel145
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan ADSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
149 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan ADSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Nissan ADSpecificationAlfa Romeo 145
4370 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1475 mmHeight—
1130 KgWeight1210 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan AD and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFiat Bravo vs Nissan AD2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableFiat Marea vs Nissan AD2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableRenault Megane vs Nissan AD2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableRenault Scenic vs Nissan AD2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo S40 vs Nissan AD2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…