DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
MX-6Model145
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats4+1
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
204 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
115 HPPower105 HP
170 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength—
1750 mmWidth—
1310 mmHeight—
1120 KgWeight1210 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…