DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
LagunaModel145
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
168 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4508 mmLength—
1752 mmWidth—
1432 mmHeight—
1255 KgWeight1210 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…