DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 2000 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeNissan
145ModelAD
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeEstate
4+1Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
255 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
YesABS—

Dimensions

—Length4370 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1475 mm
1210 KgWeight1130 Kg
—Wheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 and 2000 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…