DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMitsubishi
145ModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
105 HPPower116 HP
255 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4435 mm
—Width1710 mm
—Height1405 mm
1210 KgWeight1130 Kg
—Wheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…