E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-4SpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
CX-4ModelS80
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda CX-4SpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
158 HPPower163 HP
202 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-4SpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-4SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-4SpecificationVolvo S80
4633 mmLength4854 mm
1840 mmWidth1907 mm
1535 mmHeight1493 mm
1390 KgWeight1629 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableMazda MX-5 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model years2016 BMW Z4VSImage unavailableBMW Z4 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model years2016 Peugeot 508VSImage unavailablePeugeot 508 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model years2016 Volvo S80VSImage unavailableVolvo S80 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model years2016 Volvo V70VSImage unavailableVolvo V70 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…