DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Peugeot 508 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
508ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
213 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower158 HP
450 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Diesel / ElectricFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
3,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,0 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4633 mm
1864 mmWidth1840 mm
1521 mmHeight1535 mm
1770 KgWeight1390 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Peugeot 508 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…