2016 • BMW
Z4
BMW Z4 2016Overall Score75.5/100
2016 BMW Z4 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
CX-4
Mazda CX-4 2.0 SKYACTIV-G (158 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW Z4SpecificationMazda CX-4
BMWMakeMazda
Z4ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
BMW Z4SpecificationMazda CX-4
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
221 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
156 HPPower158 HP
240 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW Z4SpecificationMazda CX-4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW Z4SpecificationMazda CX-4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW Z4SpecificationMazda CX-4
4239 mmLength4633 mm
1790 mmWidth1840 mm
1291 mmHeight1535 mm
1395 KgWeight1390 Kg
2496 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 BMW Z4 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…