2016 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.0 D4 (163 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Volvo S80 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
CX-4
Mazda CX-4 2.0 SKYACTIV-G (158 Hp) 2016Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-4
VolvoMakeMazda
S80ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-4
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower158 HP
400 NmTorque202 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-4
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-4
4854 mmLength4633 mm
1907 mmWidth1840 mm
1493 mmHeight1535 mm
1629 KgWeight1390 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo S80 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…