DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda MX-5 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
MX-5ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
CabrioBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
214 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower158 HP
200 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
17Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3915 mmLength4633 mm
1735 mmWidth1840 mm
1225 mmHeight1535 mm
1090 kgWeight1390 Kg
130 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2700 mm

Additional Features

Mazda MX-5Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation
Mazda CX-4

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda MX-5 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…