DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 BMW Z4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-4SpecificationBMW Z4
MazdaMakeBMW
CX-4ModelZ4
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda CX-4SpecificationBMW Z4
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
200 km/hTop speed221 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
158 HPPower156 HP
202 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-4SpecificationBMW Z4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-4SpecificationBMW Z4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-4SpecificationBMW Z4
4633 mmLength4239 mm
1840 mmWidth1790 mm
1535 mmHeight1291 mm
1390 KgWeight1395 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2496 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 BMW Z4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…